By Carl McGuire



Originally Published in Bondage Life No.  7 July 1980

Transcribed by guardian46w

“My propensity for putting chains on ladies was common knowledge.  I’d ceased making any effort to conceal it, nor would there have been any particular point in doing so.  It was a sexual abnormality like many another, and in a decadent society in which the more usual forms of twisted sex, when they occurred, went unhidden and condoned, my friends, acquaintances, servants and the countryside (so long as I never indulged in excesses that might interest the police, which I never did or ever dreamed of doing) were generally tolerant, sometimes sorry for me, sometimes bored, sometimes amused… “
--William Seabrook




THE year was 1942.  There was a war going on; FDR was in the White House; Irving Klaw was still six years away from seeing the commercial possibilities of combining panties, bra, and ropes.  America, in general was a repressed society, and anything that suggested sexual deviation was kept well hidden.

And yet here was William Seabrook, a respected writer, telling the world that, back in France a decade earlier, he not only enjoyed the thought of tying up girls, he enjoyed the practice as well.  That kind of honesty is rare today; back then, it was all but unheard of.  But Seabrook was an exceptional man, well aware of his weaknesses as well as his gifts, who believed in telling the truth about himself.  In his long-out-of-print autobiography, No Hiding Place (New York: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1942), he tells of his Maryland upbringing, his young manhood, his battlefield experiences in World War I, his wives, his women, his successes as a writer, his mingling with the likes of James Joyce, Gertrude Stein, Jean Cocteau, Thomas Mann, and Aldous Huxley, his travels, his alcoholism, and his love of the sight, or even the thought of a woman who was tied or chained.

It was his ‘supreme want’, he says, the strongest force in his life.  Its roots, never fully uncovered, lay deep in his childhood, and he was aware of this force early, long before he knew it was a sexual thing.  “From the beginning in my up-to-then forever,” he tells us, referring to himself at age eight or so, “any thought, sight, picture, image, story, tale, or mere suggestion of a girl-in-chains, or with bound hands, had been more desirable than any other image, whether in the objective world of picture books, magazines, statuettes and stories, or in the subjective world of my own childish fantasy.”

And he found the raw material for his fantasy everywhere, it seems.  His father was a minister and his grandfather a newspaper editor and the family home was full of illustrated books and picture albums, history, mythology, art books, magazines.  “I found Andromeda chained sometimes to a rock and sometimes to the stars, Boadicea chained to chariot wheels, Beatrice Cenci chained most often <sic>(incomplete)

In an art book, “I found a page in which Jupiter had hung Venus by her wrists from the limb of a tree with an anvil tied to her ankles.” And in his father’s bedroom was a statuette of a pretty Greek slave, “like the Venus de Medici, except that the girl’s hands were chained together.”

Where his ‘supreme want’ came from, he did not know or care.  “All I know is that the lady-in-chains had been there always.”

But dreaming about it was not enough.  As that same early age, clearly pre-sexual, he felt the compulsion to actualize that dream.  There was a little neighbor girl named Mary Belknap, he tells us, with whom he used to climb up to the roof of a shed in the moonlight and kiss.  “She used to let me tie her hands behind her with the ribbon from her hair.”

He doesn’t call it ‘bondage’.  That word, a commercial application, really, didn’t enter the language in a specific sexual sense until later.  There were no precise words for the thing that drove him, and few like-minded people with whom he could even discuss it.  So, like an explorer in a strange land, he used the only words he knew to describe it, and in doing so, became a pioneer, quite possibly the first to travel in that strange land and then return to tell us, unashamedly, what he had found.

Seabrook is a kind of godfather to all those who themselves seek the lady in chains and who also seek to bring their quest out into the daylight.  In retrospect, this all-but-forgotten writer with the gift of honesty clearly was speaking for us.

It is a colorful life he writes about, college in South Carolina, newspapering in Georgia, bumming around Europe, a stint as a music critic in Atlanta, then marriage and the advertising business.  Just when he began to close in on success for the first time, as an advertising executive in Atlanta, an inner demon plucked him out of the safe, predictable life and sent him to France as an ambulance driver in World War I.  It was a demon he was to encounter many times, and his periodic sorties away from comfort and responsibility and toward adventure, even danger, whether in the far corners of the world or in the bottle, gave him the title of his book.  For all his running, there was no hiding to be found.

But he tried and his attempts added excitement to his life and made him mildly famous.  After attempting one career after another, advertising, writing for the King Features Syndicate, becoming associate publisher of the New York American, he found that his talent lay in writing books on exotic subjects.  From then on, his skills of expression and his periodic compulsion to head for far off locales dovetailed neatly.

He lived in the Arabian desert with the Beni Sakhr Bedouins, went on horse stealing raids with them and wrote it all down in ‘Adventures in Arabia’ in 1927.  He spent two years in the mountains of Haiti, studying voodoo, and described what he found in ‘The Magic Island’, and in the process, he tells us, became the first American writer to use the word ‘zombie’ in print.

He spent a year in the Ivory Coast jungles and, researching the natives’ practice of ritual killing and cannibalism, tasted human flesh, then described it (“It tasted like mature veal or young beef”) in ‘Jungle Ways’.  When his drinking got out of hand, he had himself committed to a New York mental hospital and even got a book out of that experience, ‘Asylum’.

Through all his travels and his writing and his socializing with the famous and near-famous, there was his obsession, lending a delicious sexual flavoring to his life, the lady in chains, in all her incarnations.  Sadly, neither of his two wives ever participated in his fantasy, but it is to their credit that they at least understood, and allowed him to seek it.

And he found it almost everywhere.  Renting a house in France with his second wife, Margorie, “We had for a while as a houseguest a lush, young, small-time actress whom I’d nicknamed Imogene,” he tells us.



She called me Georgie Porgie and was not averse to playing kissing games.  I had a short, silvered chain that fit around her crossed wrists, and she went about a good deal, mingling uninhibited with any friends who chanced to call, in the garden and even on the semi-private beach, with her wrists locked behind her.

“See what Georgie Porgie’s done to me today!  Isn’t it absurd!”



Living with the Bedouins as a guest of Sheikh Mitkhal, he found himself presented with a young girl named Aniaha, a combination servant and concubine:

“One night I tied her hands behind her, and when I awoke late next morning, she was out near the wells with the other women, gabbing, laughing, chattering, with her hands still tied behind her.  They’d washed her face and tidied her.  I was the one who was a little embarrassed.  She said it was nothing, it had happened to her before, it happened to many girls in the desert, it happened to all girls if it pleases their masters…




While settled in a country home in upstate New York with Marjorie, working on his book ‘Witchcraft’, he turned to a specific kind of research, one that involved the use of certain equipment, and certain research assistants:

“I now bought such paraphernalia as was purchasable, causing the man in the basement of Hammacher-Schlemmer to inquire whether I was connected with a circus, had in bewildered local carpenters and a blacksmith to help build what I couldn’t buy.  We made a cage similar to the one the Manchu princess who turned Taoist saint had been imprisoned in for twenty years.  We even built a witch’s cradle.  And never, when things got going, was there any dearth of young apprentice witches.  I called them ‘research workers’.  Most of them were enthusiastic volunteers.

Sometimes flamboyant young creatures came in their own cars and entered the Bluebeard’s castle to disappear for days or weeks.  Sometimes Bob Martin, our local taxi driver, brought them from the train or ferry.

“Got another ‘research girl’ for you, Bill,” he’d phone, “and she’s a lallapaloosa.”

Marjorie and our servants were long-suffering.  The countryside, a little shocked, a little amused, was tolerant too.  Whatever went on in that weird studio in the woods, it was a matter of public knowledge that I was going to write a book about it, and that, illogically, made everything forgivable.




The lady in chains came in many guises.  The most striking, perhaps, was one he encountered early on, a remarkable young woman named Deborah Luris.  If Seabrook sexually was a man ahead of his time, Miss Luris, for a woman, was light-years ahead of hers.  Visiting in New York, shortly after World War I, he met her through a mutual friend, then promptly forgot her, until a poem brought her back.  Reading a translation of Heinrich Heine, he stumbled across a passage in which the writer tells a woman that in a dream, he saw her chained to a pillar.  The image haunted him.  “The lady I saw chained by the waist to the Corinthian pillar was at first anonymous,” Seabrook says, “But one night her features began to take form in my imagination and I recognized with some surprise the face of a girl I’d met casually in New York, and then completely forgotten.”

“She had made no special impression on me and I had some trouble in recalling her name, which was Deborah something or other, Deborah Luris.  Yet here was her face now, definite and vivid, a broad, animal face, Slavic or perhaps remotely Oriental, short chin, wide mouth with curving lips, wide-set greenish eyes, exaggerated cheekbones, and a mop of copper curly hair which came down in bangs in her wide, low forehead.

She was the type that’s always being chained to pillars or tied to trees, or loaded with barbaric bangles in Victorian steel engraving…

I hadn’t said ten words to her… Knowing nothing whatever about her and doubting she’d remember me, there was no reason why she should, I took a long shot in the dark and wrote her a letter, in care of the studio.  I told her all about it, without hashing words, quoted the lines from Heine, explained that I was afflicted that way and wondered whether she’d be willing to do anything about it.  In ten days, a short note came back.”

“Sure, why not?  Come on up.  But why be so solemn and self-conscious about it?  It might be fun, you could take me to walk in the park at night, on a leash!  Something new, what!...  even for Greenwich Village.”

Good God, I thought, why the devil have I always been so solemn about it?  I’d kept a carbon of the long letter I’d written the girl, and it was sickeningly solemn.  I showed it to Katie (his first wife) with Miss Luris’ answer, and Katie said, “Go on up for a few days.  Maybe it will do you good.  Maybe she’s what you’ve been looking for.  Please don’t get into trouble, but I know you won’t do that.  You never do.”

He sent a telegram to Miss Luris and, two afternoons later, met her in the dining room of the Brevoort Hotel.  She laughed out loud when she saw me, and said, “So, you really came, I somehow didn’t think you would.  You sounded too fantastic to the real.  Have you got a whip under your coat and a pocketful of chain?”

I think I must have blushed, and then I laughed too…

She’d spoken rapid French to the waiter, was obviously, as our talk went on, as well read as I, or better.  Presently, as I sat pleased but nonplused and wondering whether I’d bitten off more than I could chew, she was telling me coolly as if we were a couple of kids planning a Sunday picnic that a fashion-illustrator friend of hers had gone off to Bermuda and lent us a garret studio overlooking the Square.  There was a big built-in couch, she said, with a ‘conveniently located’ pillar running up to the rafters.  She already had a wide metal belt, and suggested that the basement of Hammacher-Schlemmer would be a good place to get whatever locks and chains ‘we’ needed.  She’d come along, if I liked.

I was getting dizzy and a bit incredulous.

“Have you ever done anything like this before?” I asked.

“No,” she said, “at least not since I was a little girl.”

I had an idea it was going to be fireworks.  When people uncork parallel or complementary chimeric wish-fantasies, sparks generally fly.  And so, they did, for a week.




As he became more adjusted to his fantasy life, he more openly took pleasure in it, and Miss Luris was often there as an enthusiastic participant.  While he and Katie were living in Greenwich Village, they often were invited to unusual parties.

One night when the Barkentins were giving a ‘private party’ with Katie, as I recall, escorted by Sewall Haggard, I thought it may be fun to take Miss Luris on a chain.  I would be a Barbary corsair and she would be my Spanish captive maiden.  I had a Moorish sash and dagger, a big red bandana and brass curtain rings for my ears.  Miss Luris came to dinner, with a heavy handbag.  When she emerged later, she was all in red and yellow satin with a tortoise-shell comb and a wide silver belt round her slim waist.  I chained her hands behind her, hooked a dog chain to the belt, and we went to the party.

Miss Luris was one of the belles of the ball.  Everybody wanted to dance with her, and nearly everybody did.  She never asked to have her hands unchained.  Her cavaliers and dancing partners held drinks to her lips, fed her cold turkey in aspic, and when she had to powder her nose, damsels disappeared with her and aided.  I had come a long way from Westminster, Maryland, Doddsburg, South Carolina, and Rotarian Atlanta.  I had left a world where fantasy was almost reprehensible as crime and begun to touch a world in which no fantasy was taboo so long as the fantasist didn’t smoke cigars in elevators and went back to work the next day.




In his attitude toward his own desires, Seabrook seems to have moved from a kind of shame to a kind of acceptance.  When he first met Katie (a gay, brave girl, a good girl and a wise girl, too), his obsession made him unworthy of her, “We were both wrong for each other, I intrinsically wrong, unstable, twisted, she wrong only for me, as right and straight within herself as they ever come.” At another point, he tells us of the two ‘itches’ that dominate his life, the itch to write, and ‘that other diseased itch which urged me toward forbidden fantasies’.

With travel and experience, however, came perspective.  Sitting in a desert tent with Sheikh Mitkhal one night in 1926, he reflects to himself on different standards of sexuality.

‘And as for my private obsession, my delight in girls-in-chains, it was less fantastic, less outside the norm, less difficult of gratification here, than in the land from which I’d run away.  It was a less unusual thing here for an otherwise sound man to indulge in twisted sex fancies, and mine, which Brill had long ago explained to me was a mild form of sadism, fetishistic rather than bloody, cruel, or brutal, was common in Arabia.  Mitkhal knew all about it, just as my friends and acquaintances in New York knew all about it, and regarded it with an even more tolerant detachment than they… So that if it had pleased me to dangle a dozen of the most beautiful houris then available in the Euphrates Valley from the ceiling on the first night I went to bed with his niece, neither Mikhal nor she would have raised their eyebrows.




William Seabrook was a complicated man, not the most stable of men, but a talented person who was driven to experience all that life had to offer.  Finding himself in pursuit of a sexual grail so forbidden that few had ever spoken or written about it, he chose to recognize it, express it, and take delight in his quest.

And in doing so, he deserves a special place in our collective memory.  For each of us has his own dream to pursue, his own lady in chains, and like William Seabrook, we too can say that she has been there always.

The End